 |
|
|
Ancient Land Plan No.4,
David Edwards, oil on canvas, 36” X 54”
|
The mysterious abyss of light and shadow where the horizon meets
the break of light is at the center of David Edwards’ latest work. Luminescent
and austere, the glow consistent throughout Land Forms suggests an
unfathomable possibility against the surrounding shadows.
Moving beyond the turbulence of painting in a war-ravaged and
disconnected world, the Zimbabwe-born, Vancouver-based Edwards is not interested
in creating a narrative - rather, all of his pieces stand alone as nostalgia
confused with realistic depiction.
| |
 |
|
Land Elements #1
(Triptych), David Edwards, oil and collage on canvas,
12” X 36”
|
In the tradition of Turner and other late Romantic-era
landscape painters, the importance of conveying natural light, a symbol of
abandonment and transcendence, in a rapidly modernizing world is once again a
relevant social concern. The power of light to surpass the traditional view of
landscape, rural or urban, remains a compositional motif that speaks to the
power of art.
| |
 |
|
Rolling,
David Edwards, oil on canvas, 30” X 24”
|
These contemporary abstract landscapes are rendered from old
photographs and subconscious memories. Heavy mists of light, glossed over in a
thick varnish, evoke a sense of lost tranquility sealed and preserved for
further study. Nature of this calibre may have ceased to exist in the present
everyday, and for Edwards, his search for the natural leads him to a state of
the ephemeral.
This pristine landscape doesn’t actually exist outside the frame
- this moment in nature may have existed in another time and place, but in
Edwards’ world, these landscapes are clearly past fragments rendered from the
folds of history. Even in the title of the exhibition, Land Forms, there
is a double connotation – in the forms on canvas as well as the idea of how land
can be formed. Layers of nature, or the idea of nature, have constructed our
idea of how natural landscapes should look. Nature changes, but landscape
painting and artistic traditions have not.
| |
 |
|
Forest Abstraction No.2,
David Edwards,
oil on canvas, 40” X 30”
|
Edwards’ use of the words, “abstraction” and “ancient” in the
works’ titles further complicates the idea of natural realism - it suggests a
representation of things past. Recognizable as wilderness landscapes, with the
shapes of trees brushing alongside similar forms and the filter of light
reaching down to the crevices along the larger shadows, Edwards has simply
conveyed the idea of natural landscape.
His work is not entirely abstract in the stylistic senses of the
Group of Seven, or even the emotive strokes of Emily Carr’s early abstractions,
Edwards’ pieces in comparison fall more to the side of formal realism. His
abstraction comes from his subject matter, his choice to pursue untouched
nature, where the necessity of abstraction comes into play.
Transforming nature by way of artistic intent was once
considered an act of immortalization in the late Romantic era. Now, at the
beginning of the 21st millennium, immortalizing the decadence of nature by way
of art is at last the transformative act.
—
BY
Amy Fung
|